Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

MSATCM503A Mapping and Delivery Guide
Recommend a refractory for an application

Version 1.0
Issue Date: April 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency MSATCM503A - Recommend a refractory for an application
Description This unit covers the knowledge and skills needed to recommend a refractory for an application based on a knowledge of the properties, application and modes of failure of the principal refractories.
Employability Skills This unit contains employability skills.
Learning Outcomes and Application In a typical scenario, a metallurgical technician is involved with the development of a new product or process, or the improvement or redesign of an existing product/process. As part of this the requirements for an appropriate refractory material will need to be considered and a recommendation as to the type of refractory which will be appropriate for the situation will be made. This may also include evaluating suggestions made by refractory suppliers for their appropriateness to the situation.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites Pre-requisite Units
Competency Field
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities
Slides
PPT
Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Identify the process requirements for a refractory
  • Identify the pH of the metallurgical slags
  • Determine the insulating requirements from the refractory
  • Determine other process requirements from the refractory
  • Identify likely process causes of refractory failure
  • Specify refractory needs in terms of physical and chemical properties required.
       
Element: Recommend type of refractory material
  • Select a refractory class suitable for the pH of the metallurgical slag
  • Shortlist refractory materials within that class suitable for the insulting and other process demands
  • Contrast the principal modes of failure for each short listed refractory with the likely process causes of refractory failure
  • Recommend suitable refractory material/s for the job.
       
Element: Consider economic and technical implications of different modes of installation
  • . Compare possible alternative refractory materials
  • Compare possible alternative installation methods
  • Consider alternative materials with different installation methods and their overall technical/economic performance
  • Recommend a refractory material and a method of installation which delivers the best economic and technical performance for the application.
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria, Required Skills and Knowledge, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to recommend a refractory for application. Critical aspects for assessment and evidence are required to demonstrate competency in this unit.

The person will be able to select appropriate materials and installation methodologies for specified situations. Assessment may be by workplace project, case study or suitable alternative. The selection should be able to be justified on technical and economic grounds.

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

It is essential that competence is demonstrated in the ability to:

identify refractory requirements for particular metals, alloys, slags and processes

recommend refractories that are appropriate from both a technical and economic perspective

determine the mode of refractory failure and recommend a more appropriate solution

Relationship to other units

This unit may be assessed concurrently with other relevant units.

Assessment method and context

Assessment will need to occur in an organisation using refractory materials.

Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the elements, performance criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.

Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.

The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.

The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of

If evidence is provided from a complete reline, or an initial refractory lining, then one recommendation may provide sufficient evidence. Where evidence is from the ongoing maintenance of an existing refractory, then it will be needed from a range of activities to provide sufficient evidence.

Resource implications

This section should be read in conjunction with the range of variables for this unit of competency. Resources required include suitable access to an organisation using refractories that allows for appropriate and realistic simulation. A bank of case studies/scenarios and questions will also be required to the extent that they form part of the assessment method. Questioning may take place either in the workplace, or in an adjacent, quiet facility such as an office or lunchroom. No other special resources are required.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Required skills:

Apply principles to determine the pH of metallurgical slags

Select appropriate refractories for an application

Select appropriate method of refractory installation and repair

Identify root causes of refractory failures

Required knowledge:

Competency includes sufficient knowledge of:

metals and their properties and operating temperatures

furnace operations

refractory materials, purposes, common defects, installation and fixing techniques

the limitations of refractories

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Principal refractories

Principal refractories includes:

silica

alumino silicates

dolomite

magnesite-chrome,

chrome-magnesite

chrome

insulation and insulating refractories

special refractories (eg graphite, silicon carbide)

monolithic refractories ie cement, plastics, ramming mixes and castables

pH

pH of slags to be identified as acidic, basic or neutral in regards to their interaction with refractories.

Modes of installation

Modes of installation include:

monolithic

fired shape structures

bricks

other (eg sprayed)

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Identify the pH of the metallurgical slags 
Determine the insulating requirements from the refractory 
Determine other process requirements from the refractory 
Identify likely process causes of refractory failure 
Specify refractory needs in terms of physical and chemical properties required. 
 
Select a refractory class suitable for the pH of the metallurgical slag 
Shortlist refractory materials within that class suitable for the insulting and other process demands 
Contrast the principal modes of failure for each short listed refractory with the likely process causes of refractory failure 
Recommend suitable refractory material/s for the job. 
 
. Compare possible alternative refractory materials 
Compare possible alternative installation methods 
Consider alternative materials with different installation methods and their overall technical/economic performance 
Recommend a refractory material and a method of installation which delivers the best economic and technical performance for the application. 
 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

MSATCM503A - Recommend a refractory for an application
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

MSATCM503A - Recommend a refractory for an application

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: